problem |
ordinary number |
truenumber |
comment |
Knowing meaning of number |
Sometimes. Only if adequate documentation remains associated with |
Always. Every truenumber contains its subject, property, units, quantity and |
Who hasn’t asked “what is THAT number??” |
Units & conversion |
Manual. w/o documentation, no way to tell what units a |
Automatic Truenumbers know what units they are in, and what type of |
Units are time consuming and source of errors large and |
Managing numbers |
Rarely and ad-hoc. Indirectly in standards documents or spreadsheets, requirements managers, special-purpose databases…. |
Positively. Single data model, dedicated repository. Backs truenumbers in Excel, Word, email and more. |
The concept of a central repository for engineering numbers is a new one |
Communication/transfer |
Lossy, manual. Contextual information manually transferred by writing |
Perfect, automatic. Truenumbers are self-contained, just transfer the |
Degradation of numbers is a ‘silent killer’! |
Keeping custom code up to date |
Ad-hoc, manual. Constants are usually hard-coded, and parameters entered as text. Little accomodation for context. |
Dynamic and accurate. Truenumber .NET SDK allows programming with truenumbers. |
Numbers data in one place, one format, creates opportunities |